Are digital signatures really better than scanning and emailing signed papers?
Forum rules
Only projects, dapps and contracts related to Core Blockchain will be accepted.
Only projects, dapps and contracts related to Core Blockchain will be accepted.
Are digital signatures really better than scanning and emailing signed papers?
I usually just sign documents on paper, scan them, and send via email. It works, but it feels old-fashioned and maybe not the safest way. Is switching to digital signatures really worth it, or is it just hype?
- EvansCecelia
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2024 7:03 am
Re: Are digital signatures really better than scanning and emailing signed papers?
I thought exactly the same until I gave digital signatures a proper try. Scanning and emailing was fine but slow, and I worried about documents being altered. After reading about the pros on edp-award.com, I realized digital signatures are much more secure and efficient. They provide encryption, time stamps, and legal validity—things you just don’t get with scanned papers. Once I started using them, I noticed how much faster my workflow became, especially with clients abroad. No more printing, signing, scanning—it’s all instant. In my experience, it’s not hype at all; it’s a serious upgrade that saves time and protects sensitive data better than the old way.